Fun with camera, car, and drizzle, without whipers
Thursday, February 26, 2009
Eric lafforgue for a third time
Eric Lafforgue is back from a trip to Tanzania. He always manages to make wonderful images, with both great colors and subjects. What a lovely smile on this kid.
(found here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mytripsmypics/3311277978/sizes/o/ )
Eric's website is here: http://www.ericlafforgue.com/
(found here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mytripsmypics/3311277978/sizes/o/ )
Eric's website is here: http://www.ericlafforgue.com/
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
Logocal
The Twilight Calzone and other odd German products
One of the charms of driving through Germany, besides travelling at lightspeed, is the bizarness of some of the products you find in their tank shops. This thing just looks massively unappealing:
And this popsicle seems to be meant to pick your nose -or some other orifice- with:
It somehow makes a little sense to call a wine after Little Red Riding Hood -red wine, anyway. "Grandma, what big bottles you have!"
And this popsicle seems to be meant to pick your nose -or some other orifice- with:
It somehow makes a little sense to call a wine after Little Red Riding Hood -red wine, anyway. "Grandma, what big bottles you have!"
Monday, February 23, 2009
And William dances with tigers
William Winram is a legend in the making; not only is he the deepest man in the no fins category on the American Continent and the first to swim through the arch without fins, he also excels in the pool, but more importantly, he's pleasantly deranged, and perhaps even better, he's a true sharkitarian. Is that a word? It should be. He dedicates much of his time and efforts to shark conservation and raising awareness that these creatures are being ruthlessly annihilated, simply because they have a bad image and the public doesn't see a problem with killing a 'killer'. William is here to prove you can play with these creatures, as evidenced by these wonderful pictures by Frederic Buyle:
http://www.nektos.net/gallery/aliwaltigersharks/
William said that the shark in that last picture kept coming back to be petted. Notice how her eyes seem to have the slight squint of pleasure?
More on William on his webiste
More on Frederic Buyle on his website and his pictures
http://www.nektos.net/gallery/aliwaltigersharks/
William said that the shark in that last picture kept coming back to be petted. Notice how her eyes seem to have the slight squint of pleasure?
More on William on his webiste
More on Frederic Buyle on his website and his pictures
Friday, February 20, 2009
The blue
Promenade
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Lacrima di Lago
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Caution vs. Wind, Part II
Saturday, February 14, 2009
Job and the Hypothesis of the expanding heart
Yesterday, my sister had her third child, Jacobus Lambertus Wouter, we call him Job. He's another perfect baby, 7 pounds, 10 long vingers, lots of dark hair. As i was melting watching him, a hypothesis that had been floating around in me came back to the surface: i think when we see babies, we melt to facilitate the place they will take into our hearts. It is without any effort that we welcome them in our heart and that we love them without loving anyone around us any less. I find it remarkable how stretchy our hearts are and i think the melting helps - like a warm-up. I think we see the innocent and helpless perfection of a baby, and especially when it's family, we are in turn helpless to melt and allow the baby room in our hearts.
When my sister's first, Boet, was born, i was amazed at how quickly he became part of the family. He's not yet 5 and i can't imagine a life without him. His sister Wybine is not yet 3 and irrevocably part of who we are as a family, pretty much since day one. For my sister, they must have been part of the family even longer. The strange thing is, it feels like they always been there, their place with us is that familiar. Our hearts have grown to make room for them and there seems to be no end to how far it can expand further.
So i've melted for this beautiful boy. I've watched him sleep and simply by continuing to breathe he made me incredibly happy. Every move he makes and hiccup he has are works of art. Before i've again coagulated partially he'll be family and it will be unimaginable that he was not here a while back. I have no clue who he is, all i know is that he's part of part of us, and part of me.
Welcome to the world, Job; may your heart melt many times.
When my sister's first, Boet, was born, i was amazed at how quickly he became part of the family. He's not yet 5 and i can't imagine a life without him. His sister Wybine is not yet 3 and irrevocably part of who we are as a family, pretty much since day one. For my sister, they must have been part of the family even longer. The strange thing is, it feels like they always been there, their place with us is that familiar. Our hearts have grown to make room for them and there seems to be no end to how far it can expand further.
So i've melted for this beautiful boy. I've watched him sleep and simply by continuing to breathe he made me incredibly happy. Every move he makes and hiccup he has are works of art. Before i've again coagulated partially he'll be family and it will be unimaginable that he was not here a while back. I have no clue who he is, all i know is that he's part of part of us, and part of me.
Welcome to the world, Job; may your heart melt many times.
Friday, February 13, 2009
Framed by clouds
Thursday, February 12, 2009
no puddle
It took me a bit to see what this was; at first i thought it was a reflection in a puddle. Strange how i didn't instantly recognize the combination of themes in my life: orange, dog, sky. Must be cause i'm Dutch and the sight of mountains throws my brain off.
(found here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/cptspock/3259303519/sizes/l/ )
(found here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/cptspock/3259303519/sizes/l/ )
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Forrest house
Treehouse
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Project Ocean Quest
We're lucky to already have a second documentary featuring freediving announced this year. This is Frederic Buyle's endeavour,
Project Ocean Quest
which looks stunning.
Project Ocean Quest
which looks stunning.
C'est Cibelle
It's not often that i'm jealous, but when i heard the first line of this song, i wished i wrote it. "Lay your head where my heart used to be, on the earth above me." When Tom Waits sings it, you barely hear what he's talking about, cause he's doing his usual barking, but this is Cibelle's version, and i have yet to stop listening to it. It has been on almost all my playlists of the last year
Monday, February 9, 2009
Orange'a gonna play?
skyscraper or cloudtickler
Friday, February 6, 2009
Q needed
Why does James Bond type shit always look so clumsy and dumb in real life? The concept is quite cool, building a camera into a scuba-mask, but you end up swimming with a city-scape on your head:
And the specs are pretty poor, too. Then again, might be good for giving marine life laughing fits.
(found here: http://www.liquidimageco.com/ )
And the specs are pretty poor, too. Then again, might be good for giving marine life laughing fits.
(found here: http://www.liquidimageco.com/ )
No bull
This guy's freediving with bull sharks, known to be a tad curious and have a bit of an appetite for, well, anything. Another cool things Bulls can do is survive in sweet water, so they occasionally swim up rivers. I've swam with sharks, but am not sure if i'd have the balls to swim with bulls.
(found here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/84398391@N00/3257722622/sizes/l/ )
(found here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/84398391@N00/3257722622/sizes/l/ )
Greener on this side
I've never seen my backyard looking as green as it did this morning. It was the way the light hit it -and the lack of snow. That's not just a rather lame joke, i really do think grass is greener after it's been covered in snow. The cold must do something to the chloroplasts in the cells that makes them 'fresh' again, so to speak.
By the way, my backyard is suspiciously soft. As you can see, i share it with some moles, and i suspect if i jump around on the grass, i'll pay them an unexpected visit. But the grass does invite such jumping, as it is rather delicious on the soles, and the ground is so airy and bouncy that i might have to make acquaintance with my subterranean neighbours. Soles meet moles.
By the way, my backyard is suspiciously soft. As you can see, i share it with some moles, and i suspect if i jump around on the grass, i'll pay them an unexpected visit. But the grass does invite such jumping, as it is rather delicious on the soles, and the ground is so airy and bouncy that i might have to make acquaintance with my subterranean neighbours. Soles meet moles.
Thursday, February 5, 2009
The banjo lesson
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
eight kisses
When i was 19 i dove with an octopus. It approached us and stuck around for a few minutes, as curious about us as we were about it. After a while, it was in my hands and i was surprised at how pleasant the feel of this animal was, how supple and soft. When it was time for it to leave, it signaled so by suddenly changing color, and it took off. Haven't eaten calamari since.
(found here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/fathomthis/228866323/sizes/o/ )
(found here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/fathomthis/228866323/sizes/o/ )
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
Dobercar
Cup'o'Rain Man
I might be a little autistic; even though the lecture they organised in Belgium yesterday in my father's honor was interesting and complicated (about Husserl and phenomenology -which i can't even pronounce, let alone comprehend), i was distracted by my fascination for this coffee cup. It has great great lines and if i hadn't been a guest of honor and if i didn't have to come back there every year, i would have stolen it.
Monday, February 2, 2009
Cornelis Verhoeven 2-2-1928 6-11-2001
My dad would have turned 81 today. The world is a poorer place without him -even though he left it many pearls. Here's one of them.
Love
‘Love’ has become, no matter how humble in its origin -for originally the word does not aim much higher than ‘desire’- far too big a word, with which after centuries of abuse hardly anything serious can be done. Who uses it lightly, presents himself as a
dimwit. Really it’s deplorable, that this word has become laughable and that ‘I love you’ has started to mostly resemble a hollow declamation. Whoever wants to say anything in connection to love, has to say something small and lean; and it preferably has to sneak in through a side-entrance to still be believable in a world of show-offy inflation. Solely as a side issue can love survive, for the main issues have all already choked on emphasis and imitation. The vulnerability that ‘love’ and other words for affection must once have had has disappeared completely in noisy kitsch, as far as it hadn’t been already walzed down under the weight of a moralism that wants to replace all the blessings of vulnerability with the certainties of duty and regulations. For also as a duty and a commandement love seems to be chanceless. Only the appearance of it can be prescribed.
The most beautiful, most elementary and most touching among the endless lot that has been said about love is, to my feeling, the dry defiinition by Spinoza, translated as: “Love is happiness, accompanied by the idea of an external cause”. In this description it boils down that love, in its most essential form, is a happiness, arroused by the existence of someone else who is regarded as both the source and the subject of it. The description is so elementary and at the same time so touching because it is minimal and stripped of all noise and all fatty noblicity. Love in the Ethics of Spinoza is not a a commandment or an expensive duty we fulfill, perhaps against our will and as an offer; it is also not a power that spins a slimey thread around the other and dominates, but a simple happiness because of the pure fact that the other is there. For example, people love their children, and them maybe the very most, because they are glad those exist, just the way they are. There’s nothing possesive in the love and loving according to Spinoza. On further consideration, the minimum he describes is at the same time the highest and most altruistic level that affection can reach, almost devinely one-sided.
Only the difficulty is again, that this all too can be easily repeated purely verbally and can be forged. Even the happiness, that is the elementary basis of love with Spinoza, can, once it has been integrated into the pressing packet of duties and exaggerations, be easily imitated and be thrown into a window display as an infectious smile. There probably is on no terrain as much annoying fake and forgery as right here, on the ground of naivity itself, one of the few things of which only the authenticity is worth something and should have meaning. Of course Spinoza did not mean that happiness is mandatory or that it should be produced artificially, but that it, when it is there and somebody catches himself -so to speak- involuntarily being happy, it turns itself as a warm affection towards its source in the other, outside of the circle of all we can decide over. It discovers itself as a form of gratitude for the existence of that other one and it cannot be more, for this is the highest.
~ Cornelis Verhoeven
Love
‘Love’ has become, no matter how humble in its origin -for originally the word does not aim much higher than ‘desire’- far too big a word, with which after centuries of abuse hardly anything serious can be done. Who uses it lightly, presents himself as a
dimwit. Really it’s deplorable, that this word has become laughable and that ‘I love you’ has started to mostly resemble a hollow declamation. Whoever wants to say anything in connection to love, has to say something small and lean; and it preferably has to sneak in through a side-entrance to still be believable in a world of show-offy inflation. Solely as a side issue can love survive, for the main issues have all already choked on emphasis and imitation. The vulnerability that ‘love’ and other words for affection must once have had has disappeared completely in noisy kitsch, as far as it hadn’t been already walzed down under the weight of a moralism that wants to replace all the blessings of vulnerability with the certainties of duty and regulations. For also as a duty and a commandement love seems to be chanceless. Only the appearance of it can be prescribed.
The most beautiful, most elementary and most touching among the endless lot that has been said about love is, to my feeling, the dry defiinition by Spinoza, translated as: “Love is happiness, accompanied by the idea of an external cause”. In this description it boils down that love, in its most essential form, is a happiness, arroused by the existence of someone else who is regarded as both the source and the subject of it. The description is so elementary and at the same time so touching because it is minimal and stripped of all noise and all fatty noblicity. Love in the Ethics of Spinoza is not a a commandment or an expensive duty we fulfill, perhaps against our will and as an offer; it is also not a power that spins a slimey thread around the other and dominates, but a simple happiness because of the pure fact that the other is there. For example, people love their children, and them maybe the very most, because they are glad those exist, just the way they are. There’s nothing possesive in the love and loving according to Spinoza. On further consideration, the minimum he describes is at the same time the highest and most altruistic level that affection can reach, almost devinely one-sided.
Only the difficulty is again, that this all too can be easily repeated purely verbally and can be forged. Even the happiness, that is the elementary basis of love with Spinoza, can, once it has been integrated into the pressing packet of duties and exaggerations, be easily imitated and be thrown into a window display as an infectious smile. There probably is on no terrain as much annoying fake and forgery as right here, on the ground of naivity itself, one of the few things of which only the authenticity is worth something and should have meaning. Of course Spinoza did not mean that happiness is mandatory or that it should be produced artificially, but that it, when it is there and somebody catches himself -so to speak- involuntarily being happy, it turns itself as a warm affection towards its source in the other, outside of the circle of all we can decide over. It discovers itself as a form of gratitude for the existence of that other one and it cannot be more, for this is the highest.
~ Cornelis Verhoeven
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)